Learning Objects to Support Inquiry-Based, Online Learning

 Learning Items to Support Inquiry-Based, Online Learning Essay

Running Head: Promoting Inquiry-Based Learning

Learning Objects to Support Inquiry-Based, Online Learning

Chandra Hawley Orrill

Kentkucky University


The current push toward reusable, easy to build tools for supporting data acquisition in learning environments (Downes, 2000; Merrill & Group, 1998; Myers, 1999) is a crucial one for additional consideration. During your time on st. kitts are unquestionably advantages to the development of these types of learning things, we have, as being a field, overlooked the most important part of the tools – how they support student learning. The discussion upon learning items thus far features focused mainly on their style and specialized development (e. g., LTSC, 2000). The purpose of this section is to illustrate one potential use of learning objects – as support tools within a project-based action learning environment. This environment depends on college student immersion in real-world difficulties with scaffoldings of varied kinds to support their request (Jonassen, 1999). Further, and perhaps most vitally, it includes sociable interaction amongst peers (e. g., Duffy & Cunningham, 1996; Jonassen, 1999; Savery & Duffy, 1995). " The process of using technology to improve learning is never solely a technical matter, concerned simply with homes of hardware and software. Like a textbook or any other cultural thing, technology resources for education – whether a software science ruse or an interactive studying exercise – function in a social environment, mediated by learning conversations with peers and teachers” (Bransford, Brownish, & Cocking, 1999, p. 218).

As conceptualized by the ID2 group (e. g., Merrill, 99; Merrill, 1998; Merrill, Roberts, & Li, 1996), learning objects present ease of development, a high degree of interchangeability, and a higher level of individualized learning than classic group-focused training interventions. Yet , these things grow away of and exemplify a strong information digesting foundation (Driscoll, 1994). After all, used as standalone educating agents, they will rely exclusively on the notion that info – which in turn, in this opinion system is synonymous with " knowledge” (Mayer, 1999) – is a item that can be transported from the computer system to the scholar. Once the student has found the information and studied the info, she will be able to pass the test on that information. And, presumably, once the student provides processed the knowledge, she will have the ability to use it within a larger knowledge base. Nowadays in this conception, there is also a strong hovering toward the idea that people should certainly learn small amounts of discrete information at one time and slowly and gradually build a network of these data chunks. For example, an object might teach just one process or idea. When that articles is mastered, the student is going to move on to the next process or idea. Every single object can be discrete and separate from the next. In the long run, however , trainees is expected to tie these discrete items together in order to understand larger ideas. In this additive approach to education, it will be assumed that if a spanish student were to study maps of every region of the world independently, that learner would eventually have the ability to create a representation of the world. Finally, we have a strong emphasis in the common conception of learning items on the traditional " demonstration, practice, feedback” model that may be regarded as a great tool in assisting deliver info to learners. That is, the training object reveals the information, supplies the student with an infinite amount of practice, and provides a evaluation that allows the computer to provide responses. This harkens back to the view that mainly because computers will be infinitely patient, the student is free to work with the material to get as long as necessary, and, in the event she fails to master the information, she will have the ability to revisit the training object. Naturally , it does not accept, or even acknowledge, the notion the...

References: APA (American Mental Association) (1997). Learner-centered internal principles. Wa, D. C.: American Psychological Associations ' Board of Educational Affairs.

Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. G. (1992). Theory into practice. In To. M. Duffy & G. H. Jonassen (Eds. ), Constructivism plus the technology of instruction (pp. 17-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Co-workers.

Boyer Commission rate on Education Undergraduates inside the Research University (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America 's analysis universities. Rocky, flinty, pebbly Brook, BIG APPLE: Author.

Bransford, J. Deb., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, Ur. R. (1999). How persons learn: Head, mind, experience, and university. Washington, D. C.: Countrywide Academy Press.

Brown, L. S. (2000). Growing up digital: The way the Web alterations work, education, and the ways people learn. Change, 32(2), 10-20.

Dark brown, J. S i9000., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated experience and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

Bruner, L. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Downes, S i9000. (2000, Might 23, 2000). Learning things, [essay]. Available: http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/downes/naweb/Learning_Objects.htm [2000, May].

Driscoll, M. L. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Cash.

Entwistle, N., & Marton, F. (1994). Knowledge things: Understandings constituted through extensive academic examine. The English Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 161-178.

Fleming, L. (1998). Web navigation: Developing the user knowledge. Sebastopol, CA: O 'Reilly & Acquaintances, Inc.

Hillside, J. L. (1999). A conceptual platform for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 5-27.

Slope, J. R., & Terrain, S. Meters. (1998, Feb 18-22). Open-ended learning environment: A assumptive framework and model intended for design. Conventional paper presented in the Convention with the Association pertaining to Educational Marketing communications and Technology, St . Paillette, MO.

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning conditions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed. ), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional technology (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

LTSC (Learning Technology Standards Committee), (March, 2000). Standards intended for learning object metadata, [website]. IEEE. Available: http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOMv4.1.htm [2000, July].

Lave, J., & Wenger, Elizabeth. (1991). Situated learning: Legit peripheral contribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, Ur. H. (1999). Designing teaching for constructivist learning. In C. Meters. Reigeluth (Ed. ), Instructional design ideas and versions: A new paradigm of training technology (Vol. II, pp. 141-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McCombs, M. L., & Whisler, L. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Merrill, D. Meters. (1992). Constructivism and training design. In T. M. Duffy & D. They would. Jonassen (Eds. ), Constructivism and the technology of teaching (pp. 99-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Merrill, M. Deb. (1999). Instructional transaction theory. In C. Reigeluth (Ed. ), Instructional-design theories and models: A brand new paradigm of instructional technology (Vol. II, pp. 397-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Merrill, M. D., & Group, We. R. (1998). ID professional: A second era instructional development system. Instructional Sciences, 26(3-4), 243-262.

Merrill, M. Deb., Jones, M. K., & Li, Z .. (1996). Educational transaction theory: Instructional style based on understanding objects. Educational Technology, 36(3), 30-37.

Myers, K. L. (1999). Is there a place for instructional style in the information age? Educational Technology, 39(6), 50-53.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing world wide web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Posting.

Schank, Ur. C., Berman, T. R., & Mcpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed. ), Instructional design hypotheses and types: A new paradigm of educational technology (Vol. II, pp. 161-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Acquaintances.

Schon, Deb. A. (1987). Educating the reflective specialist: Toward a brand new design to get teaching and learning inside the professions. San Fancisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Stinson, J. E., & Milter, R. G. (1996). Problem-based learning in business education: Program design and implementation problems. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 33-42.

U. S i9000. Department of Labor (1991). What job requires of schools. Washington, D. C.: The Admin 's Commission rate on Reaching Necessary Abilities.

Vygotsky, D. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wiley, G. A. (1999). Learning items and the new CAI: Just what exactly do I do with a learning object?[essay]. Available: http://wiley.byu.edu [2000, July].

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Learning object style and sequencing theory. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Small University, Provo, UT. Readily available: http://davidwiley.com/papers/dissertation/dissertation.pdf


Examining Objectives of General Education Teachers’ of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder The Relationship to Academic Instruction...

Examining Expectations of General Education Teachers' of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder & its Marriage to Academics Instruction Tonya Trepinski Baylor University Advantages As a teacher in the public…...

  • Tawana Anderson
  • 24.08.2019
  • Design

Design Essay

The Influence with the Roman Arch Ancient Ancient rome achieved many great achievements that have influenced numerous ethnicities. Elements of Roman law have been completely adopted by various government authorities…...

Benefit of Learning English Essay

SUBJECTIVE This newspaper present an assessment the benefits of learning SBLE1042, English language For Communication II. The essence the daily news is to identify the advantages of learning English. While an…...

Learning Theory Essay

Learning theory (education) Learning ideas are conceptual frameworks that describe just how information is usually absorbed, highly processed, and stored during learning. Cognitive, psychological, and environmental influences, and…...

Essay regarding I Wish I had fashioned a Magic Pen

I wish I had a magic pen A wish can be something which u really want. Anything which u really needs to possess. A wish could be anything;…...

Essay about Bringing Down your house: An Analysis of the Deceit of the Undervalued

п»їKayla GrayName Professor Imbur English 1110 23 AprilFebruary 2014 Slashing the House: An Analysis with the Misrepresentation with the Underestimated Inside the movie Bringing Down the…...

Air Pollution in China and Azerbaijan Dissertation

Smog in China and Azerbaijan Introduction As the whole world evolves rapidly, air pollution has become increasingly more severe. In modern society, polluting of the environment…...

Comparison of CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT Paralegal Essay

Comparison of CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT & Paralegal By Professor Kerry Jones ENGL 227 Table of Articles Introduction Choosing a career path can…...

Soil Frq for Apes Research Daily news

Dirt FRQ A) One chemical garden soil test we could do can be described as pH level test and so we are able to inform what seeds can…...

Ten Best ways to Improve The English Essay

10 Most Effective Ways to Improve The English 800-1000 words article 1 . Browse: Read everything in British. You can read story books, newspaper publishers, magazines, weblogs, comics, English…...